The Shift from Many Hats to System Steward
In my early days as an operator, I prided myself on being a generalist.
I could build a deck, restructure a workflow, rally a cross-functional team, and troubleshoot an integration—often all in the same week. I wore many hats, not just willingly, but proudly. The speed, the variety, the scrappiness—it was intoxicating. There was always something to fix, something to finish, something to figure out.
But as I’ve evolved in my work—and the complexity of the organizations I support has grown—something has shifted.
These days, I find myself asking fewer “how do we do this?” questions, and more “why are we doing it this way?” questions.
It’s no longer about just doing the work. It’s about designing the systems that make the work sustainable.
This shift wasn’t marked by a promotion or title change. It didn’t come with a formal announcement. It emerged slowly, in the space between sprint and strategy. In the quiet, noticing:
- When a last-minute fire drill was actually the result of an upstream misalignment
- When a team missed an OKR not because they weren’t capable—but because the system rewarded output over outcomes
- When adding more resourcing wasn’t the solution—clarifying decision rights was
- When I realized that creating clarity was often more impactful than creating output
This is the often-invisible work of system stewardship. It doesn’t show up in the project tracker. It doesn’t always make a big splash. But it’s what enables real scale.
And perhaps more than anything, it’s what differentiates a strong generalist from a strategic operator.
Because being in every room isn’t the same as connecting every room.
Now, I still value my generalist roots. They’ve made me adaptable, curious, able to see around corners. But the deeper value I bring today is in how I weave across functions, how I protect the integrity of the operating system, and how I create alignment without always being at the center.
I don’t see this shift talked about enough.
It’s not about becoming a specialist. It’s about becoming a steward of momentum—protecting the throughline in moments of growth, transition, and change.
It’s less about being hands-on everywhere, and more about making the system run smoother—so others can lead with clarity.
I remember a time when a team was struggling to hit a product milestone. On the surface, it looked like a bandwidth issue. The instinct was to throw more hands at the problem or jump in myself to fill the gaps. But after a few honest conversations, the root cause emerged: misalignment. Teams were moving fast—but not together. The roadmap meant different things to different people.
Instead of stepping in to do more, I stepped back to do different.
We rebuilt the operating cadence. Clarified ownership. Created lightweight, shared checkpoints. Suddenly, the work started to flow again—not because we added speed, but because we added structure.
For fellow operators, consider this: Where are you designing for scale, not just speed? Where can you create cohesion, not just capacity?
You may still wear many hats. But you might also be holding the architecture. And that changes everything.